Refuting Two Wahabis : Abu Hibbaan & Abu Khuzaimah Ansaari : Part 1
I have seen two wahabis , with the name ” Abu Hibban and Abu khuzaimah” hanging out on internet and spreading lies against scholars of Ahlus sunnah. Since most of their artciles are posted on wahabi forum , there is no body to keep a check on lies of these people. Here is point by point refutation to these two wahabis , who have also attacked Shaykh GF Haddad .
The Wahabi lieing machine has produced many works on internet. Those who have no Fear of Allah and no love of Rasul Allah [sal allahiu alayhi wa sallam] , are known to fabricate book, by quoting incomplete statements, provide wrong translation , deleting the whole passage , and some times fabricating a totally non existing book and attributing it to great scholars of Ahlus sunnah.
In their hatred to attack the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah they often use their most developed weopon and that is: The art of deception!
Dr Mahmood Al Deobandi, completed his PhD in” Barelwism” and submitted his research which is available in the market as “Mutalae Barelwiat”. This forum is witness to the fact that how this Deobandi scholar was exposed when his book was scanned in which he has used his deobandi mind while analyzing the incidence of Shaykh Dabbagh.
The Wahabis living outside the subcontinent joined with Dr Khalid Mahomood al Deobandi in attacking the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah. The easiest way for them was to translate the contenets of this Urdu book “Mutalae Barelwiat” and present it to the general muslim population .A normal muslim who does not have time to cross check the authenticity will then start believing on these contenets and will move away from the scholars of Ahlus sunnah. In this way wahabis succeed in taking people away from Ahlus sunnah to wahabism , the sect formed by their leader in the beginning of 17th century.
Two wahabis under the name” Abu Hibbaan & Abu Khuzaimah Ansaari” translated some contenets from this Deobandi book” Mutalae Barelwiat” and posted on internet. Before these two are refuted, I would like to present something from “ Mutalae Barelwait” the original source from where these tow wahabis have take their lie .
Dr Khalid al Deobandi writes in “Mutalae Barelwiat” :
“
Famous British historian Peter Hardi in his book The Muslims of the British India writes about Abdul Hamid Badayuni and Abdul Majid Badayuni:
“For their activates the brothers Abdul Hamid and Abdul Majid were well rewarded by the government. Medals denotation the title of Shams-ul-Ulama dangled from their turbans, while for his anti-Khilafat work Abdul Majid was one of the most rewarded men in the province.”
Why is that this deobandi scholar is quoting a British historian? What prevents him from quoting any Indian or any Muslim historian? The truth is this deobandi scholar has totally deceived muslim. Any one who wants to see this can pick any book on Indian History and see the members of Khilafat committee. Allama Abdul Majid Badayuni was also the part of delegation which went to wahabi kingdome to show protest against the destruction of Baqi cemetery by the wahabi forces. Those who don’t have access to book can google search “ Abdul Majid Badayuni”and see the result. Khilafat committee compromised of both sunii and deobandi scholars.
I request every reader to check that google search option.
Another lie which Dr Mahmood al Deobandi has given to his deobandi readers is that these two Ahlus sunnah scholars were given the title of ‘Shamshul Ulema” by the British government.
Again , this can be cross checkeed to expose Dr Khalid Deobandi. We have many works of these two scholars both in printed and manuscript form, where they have not used this title. We have other historian and deobandi scholars who have written about these scholars and no one has used this title for them . Where is this title mentionf? Who gave them? Dr Mahmood Deobandi does not know that not even one scholar was given this title in the entire district of Bdayaun by the britishers!
Instead of relying on British historian only if Dr Mahmood al deobandi would have done his own research , then he would not have been in this situation .
When truth can not be refuted people resort to lieing !
Now we focus on two wahabis who have take passages from this deobandi book . Insha Allah they will be refuted point by point.
Refuting Two Wahabis : Abu Hibbaan & Abu Khuzaimah Ansaari : Part 2
The wahabi article is posted in wahabi awakening website.
Wahabi duo says
“
Haddad the rabid soofee quotes from one Fadl al-Rasul al-Badayuni in ‘Albani and his Friends pg.51-55)
However
as mentioned in part 4, al-Badayuni said, “Making idols for the purpose of being worshipped is not disbelief (Kufr).” (Fataawa Maulana Fadl Rasool Badayooni pg.14, Mufeed Khalaa’iq Press ShaahjahaanAbaad 1228H).
So this is the one who Haddad saw fit to quote from, in order to rebuke Imaam Muhammad Ismaa’eel Shaheed, this Badayuni the one who promoted and allowed idol worship. We seek refuge in Allaah from the disease of Shirk”
Refutation
Before we discuss the whole fatwa , I would like every muslim to see this wahabi methodology where in a fatwa which approves” idol making” has been equated with “ idol worship”. This is the true wahabi aqidah , calling muslims as kafir . Please go back and again read the analysis by these two wahabi where they have accused Mawlana Fazl e Rasul Badayuni [rh] of two things:
1.Promoting Idol worship
2.Allwoing Idol worship
These barefoot and naked, the deaf and dumb wahabis did not bother to check the question ! Before calling a muslim as “promoter of Idol worship” was it not required by these wahabis to investigate the matter?
This question was asked by the Emperor of India , Bahadur Shah Zafar . When the British colonial power took control of all business and even the cloth industry was taken by the britishers then many Indian became jobless . Some pf them started working in idol and toy making business . It was at this time the emperor of India sent this question to the most qualified sunni scholar of his time.
And the answer given was “Making idols for the purpose of being worshipped is not disbelief (Kufr)., but the earning will be Haram”
There is no dispute in this ruling , but it is the way in which these wahabis present statement which confuses general population. Those who do not know the difference between Shirk and Haram should study basic fiqn before pointing fingers on scholars like Shaykh GF Haddad { damatbarakatuh aalia}
Can we see the truth? But no , if you are a wahabi then you don’t have !
We seek refuge in Allah from the diease of lie and mujassima aqida. !
Sayyiyd Abdul-Hayy Husainee said about him, “He was a trouble maker, bigoted, a debater, a strong exposer of the Sunnah and a caller to innovations, an enemy of the people of the Haqq and a friend of wordly affairs. He worked for the british government and used to receive money (ie on the payroll) from the leaders of rural states and in addition to this his writings (books, and treatises and articles) would be printed by the British government from their presses.” (Nazhatul-Khawaatir 7/377-378, Akmal at-Taareekh, this is the biography of Fadl ar-Rasul al-Badayuni authored by Munshee Muhammad Ya’qoob Hussain Badayuni and refer also to Tadhkirrah Ulama Hindh pg.381 printed from Karachee)
The wahabis have provided three references for the above statement, one of them is wrong. The above quote is not present in Akmal at Taareekh . Neither is there any use quoting Tadhkirraj Ulama Hind , which has reference from Nazhatul Khawatir and was written by Deobandis slandering every sunni scholar.
Now we are left with “Nazhatul Khawatir” written by Sayyed Abdul Hayy, father of Ali Mian Nadawi.
But why have wahabis left other sunni i historians ? Why do wahabis hesitate to search” Fazle rasul badayuni” in the history?
And why do wahabis hide this fact that sayyed Abdul hayy was also a Wahabi! Why don’t they tell that he was a follower of Sayed Ahmed Barelwi ( shaykh of Ismail dehalvi) ?What prevents them from revelaing this fact ? Why don’t they tell that he is same Abdul Hayy who on the dipute of temple and masjid [ Aydodhya issue] , sided with hindus and said that the masjid was built by destroying a temple.
It is unfortunate that no sunni scholar from India wrote any historical biographical dictionary in Aarbic, so when ever an arab has to look for information about an India scholar he picks “ Nazhatul Khawatir” which has not only presented every sunni scholar in bad view but the author has even chnaged names of scholar so as to give different meaning. [ Sharafuddin was written as sharfiddin , because he was a sufi ] . At this point I do not wish to go into this detail and we will come back to the original quote.
“He was a trouble maker, bigoted, a debater, a strong exposer of the Sunnah and a caller to innovations, an enemy of the people of the Haqq and a friend of wordly affairs.”
Yes he was a trouble maker for wahabis . Read his books against wahabis. Read his classical work “ Sayf al Jabbar’ which has been printed from Turkey as well and is counted among the best book against wahabis. Read his classical book on Aqida and Kalam “ Al Muataqad Al Muntaqad “ in which he has refuted the possibility of lie from Allah and gave a severe blow to wahabi movement in India.
He was a descented of Sayyedina Uthman [rd] and had no respect for any one who showed disrespect to prophet and awliya Allah. He wrote books proving validity of Mawlid and tawassul , hence in wahabi terminology he was an “innovator” ! He was an enemy of Wahabis , we all agree [ Read sayf al jabbar] , so the wahabi historian Abdul hayy calls this great sunni scholar as “ caller to innovation and enemy of people of haqq”. It is the same term which wahabis [ in their short history of 250 yrs] have used on sunni scholars !
Read any wahabi book or visit any wahabi website , you will find same usage , where wahabis have shamelessly called themselves as “ people of haq” and called Ahlus sunnah as “ caller to innovation”.
It is sufficent to know that Abdul Hayy was a wahabi and has been refuted by many sunni scholars. Those refutations are in Urdu.
He worked for the british government and used to receive money (ie on the payroll) from the leaders of rural states and in addition to this his writings (books, and treatises and articles) would be printed by the British government from their presses.”
The wahabi duo should have read history before translating this from Abdul hayy;s book
These two wahabis don’t know history of this Uthmani family. The great grand father of Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni migrated to India 800 years back He was a reputed scholar and was requested by Nawab of Badayun to accept the post of Qadi. Since then this family has produced scholar in every geneartion. At present the head of the family is Mawlana Salim Qadri . He has three sons all of them are scholars and eldest one is a graduate from Al Azhar with specilalization in Tafsir. He is one of the leading Ahlus sunnah scholar in India wotking against wahabis. In India two cities are known as center of Ahlus sunnah : Barelilly and Badayun .
In every age members from this family became the Official Qadi of Badayun and were given lot of patronage by the rulers. To educate these wahabis , I have to tell them , in India in every age , the Muslim rulers have given high monthly allotment to scholars. When British started taking control of India , they took all powers from Nawabs , but let them act as Nawab . All the tax and income from the land was no longer available to the Nawab. But as per the agreement between the Nawab and British , the british will make monthly payment to Offical Qadi and other other memebrs of Nawab family
[ It is on record that in some cases even kings were given monthly payment by British ]
Since Abdul Hayy did not explain the history in detail , so Khalid Deobandi also did not bother to investigate this ! He shold have atleast checked from his own deobandi books! And these two wahabi duos have blindly trasnalte the passage !
His books were not printed from British press, but the verdicts [ fatwa] which he gave and the fatwa asked by the Nawab , those fatwas used to be printed in press and not “ british press”. Nizami press of Badayun was well developed in those days.
As mentioned above, the biographer of Maulana Fadl al-Rasul al-Badayuni, Munshee Muhammad Ya’qoob Hussain Dhiyaa al-Qaadiree Badayuni (a soofee) also mentioned that he used to work for the British government and was on their payroll and receive money from the leaders of rural states and provinces. (see his Akmal at-Taareekh 2/372, 380, 512 printed in 1331H)
May Allah guide those who lie. Munshi yaqub hussein was a member of Nawab’s coucil and what he has mentioned is that , after the british took control of the Badayun district , the monthly allotment was no longer given by Nawab to Mawlana , but as per the agreement between Nawab and British , it was then made available to Mawalan Fazle Rasul Badayuni [ rh]
He would also receive money from the leaders of Hydraabaad and they would lookafter him, give him sittings in their gatherings and the rest of the affair and they would help him financially. (Fuqaaha Of Paak and Hind 3/133-134.)
One can chose any name on internet and go on posting lies ,after all these wahabis have no fear of Allah.
Mawlana Fazle Rasul Badayuni [ Rh] was a wali of Allah. He was the leading shaykh of India in Qadri tariqah. He had many mureed [ disciple] all over the India . Many member of Royal Niazm’s family were his mureed and when they used to come to meet their shaykh , they would bring many presnets and when ever he went to their place [ in hyderabad] they would get up to show respect! It is in this context this incidence has been mentioned and these wahabis have again tried to deceive people!
[ Abdul Qadir Badayuni Rh was chosen by the Nawab of Hyderabad as the offical Qadi of whole of India . Wahabis should read history books]
Refuting Two Wahabis : Abu Hibbaan & Abu Khuzaimah Ansaari : Part 3
He was very bigoted and staunch, reaching the realms of extremeism and in this he refuted and rebuked Mujaddid Alf Thaanee and Shaah Waleeullaah Dehlawee and in their affair he would go beyond bounds. (Fuqaaha Of Paak and Hind 3/134.)
Let these wahabis know that they are quoting Deobandi book and it gives no reference . Are they shy to tell that their reference book is a deobandi book and which gives no reference. When will we know , that what was the attack which was made on Imam Rabbani Rd and Shah waliyullah Rh ? In which book? What is the quote?
Since Dr Mahmood al Deobandi did not give details , so these wahabis along with some deobandi on some forum , can not provide the details , since they depend on Mahmood al deobandi!
Badayuni also wrote some books against Ahlus-Sunnah, ie al-Bawaariq al-Muhammadiyyah, Tas-heeh al-Masaa’il, Sayf al-Jabbaar, al-Mu’taqad al-Muntaqad and others. This enemy of Ahlus-Sunnah and the muslims also wrote an explanation of Fusoos al-Hikam, the book of the Kaafir, disbeliever Ibn Arabee.
How shamelessly these wahabis who have mujassima aqida have called themselves as ‘ Ahlus sunnah” !I need not say anyhting on those books . Every reader can google ‘ sayf al jabbar” and see what it is ! It is considered one of the best book ever written against wahabis ! All his other books are on Aqida and refuting wahabis. Imam Ahmed Raza Khan [rh] wrote commentary to “al-Mu’taqad al-Muntaqad” and this book is included as a part of syllabus in many India madaris.
This enemy of Ahlus-Sunnah and the muslims also wrote an explanation of Fusoos al-Hikam, the book of the Kaafir, disbeliever Ibn Arabee.
These wahabis are ashmed to be called wahabis so they chose ‘ ahlus sunnah ‘ for themselves! And then they make takfir on Sayyedina Ibn Al Arabi [ rd] .
Every sunni can now see , that why wahabis ( inclusing Abdul Hayy) hate Mawlana fazle rasul Badayuni ! His classical works on Aqida , Kalam , mantiq . fiqh and tasawwuf and made all the wahabis go answerelss . Most of his works are in Arabic and persian .
Fadl al-Rasul al-Badayuni worked for the british government, first he was a muftee for them and then moved to being a clerical worker, he also worked for Raajah Nawaab Singh. Later when his home town of Badayun fell out of the hands of the Britsh government during the war of independence in 1857ce, he helped the british, saving their wealth and lives just to maintain their control. (Fuqaaha Of Paak and Hind 3/134)
A bareilwee historian Doctor Muhammad Ayoob Qaadiree wrote, “When the control of british government finished in Badayun there was chaos everywhere but Moulwee Fadl Rasul Badyuni restored some order (for the british) and tried to save the lives of the people (And whose lives he tried to save is clarified further). Hence the newspaper Jabeeb of Badayun 25th June 1857ce corresponding to 3 Dhul-Qadah 1273H mentions, “And because the Holy scholar and Soofee Moulwee Fadl al-Rasul had organised things very well, there were no major incidences. He by risking his life from the hooligans and mob saved attempted to save the people and the people were the soldiers of the british government and he tried fully to restore peace and order.” (The War of Indepedence 1857ce, Events and Personalities pg.140)
The bareilwee historian Ayoob Qaadiree also mentions that some of the followers, close associates like the biographer of Moulwee Fadl al-Rasul Badayuni attempted to brush this aside and hide the reality of this affair but the reality is apparent and well known to those who consult the books of the history of India. (The War of Indepedence 1857ce, Events and Personalities pg.141
Readers can see that our wahabi duo have contradicted themself now! Earlier they have quoted Munshi Yaqoob Badayuni as their evidence and now they claim that Munshi yaqoob used to hide things and lie ! This sort of mistakes happen when instead of doing personal investigation wahabis reosrt to translatiion !
Here again facts have been twisted . I have never seen any book with this name from Prof Ayyub Qadri. But I present a book written by same author on this topic , especiallay dealing with revolt of 1857.
Mawlana Faiz Ahmed Badayuni [ rh] was the son I of Mawlana Fazl e rasul’s sister. ( Bhanja). He was also a mureed [ disciple] of Mawlana Fazle rasul [rh] He participated in 1857 revolution agaisnt British and british army was behind him. His body could never be found.
It was during this incidence , when Mawlana Fazle haq requested the people of his town to look for Mawlana Fayz Ahmed . British army had upper edege in Badayun , then from whom did Mawlana save this army from?
Refuting Two Wahabis : Abu Hibbaan & Abu Khuzaimah Ansaari : Part 4
Alhamdulillah, all praise be to Allaah, the scholars of Ahlul-Hadeeth answered all of his allegations and despicable lies and errors. So Shaikh Qadhee Basheer ud deen Qanoojee answered Badayuni’ al-Bawaariq and obliterated its contents in his ‘as-Sawaa’iq al-Aalhiyyah Lee-Radd Shayateen al-Lahbiyyah’ and in answer to Badayuni’s Tas-heeh al-Masaa’il Qaadhee Basheer ud deen authored ‘Tafheem al-Masaa’il’
From Ahlus sunnah , now the wahabis have become Ahlul hadeeth! They should know that these wahabis books were refuted again when Mawlana fazle rasul [rh] wrote TANBIH AL JAHIL .
Also in answer to Badayuni’s works, Shaikh Muhammad Taqee Khaan Dehlawee authored ‘an-Nashr’ and Shaikh Siraaj Ahmad Sehsawaanee (d.1279H) authored ‘Siraaj ul-Eemaan’ in support of Taqwiyyatul-Eemaan and answered all the allegations levied by Badayuni and other soofee’s. In addition to this Shaikh Haider Alee Taunkee (d.1272H) authored his monumental ‘Siyaanatul an-Naas Ann Waswasatul-Khannaas’ in refutation of Badayuni’s allegations, which he raised in his books and much more.
.. And do these wahabis know that these were again refuted under one title “ Tauseequl Haq”.?
he also attacked Ahlus-Sunnah, refuted the works of Shaah Waleeullaah Dehlawee, in specific his Izaalatul-Khafa Ann Khilaafatul Khulafaa and his Durratul-Aynayn and others and concluded these books were gainst Ahlus-Sunnah. (refer to Badayuni’s al-Bawaariq pg.27-32).
I can scan above reference provided any deobandi/ wahabi can tell me what was the ” attack” .
So this is the affair of two leading wahabis on internet ! Posting lies and relying on some one else , who inturn is a bigger lier them them!
Abdullah Chisti-Sabri.